Hexagon Measurement      Systems

No matter what Hexagon measurement equipment or software you use, we want to hear your ideas and suggestions on how we can improve.

  • Your feedback and voting will benefit the majority of users.
  • You have 10 votes which you can allocate to your own or other users ideas.
  • We will focus on trying to realize the top voted items in our future products.

Thanks for your assistance in helping us shape the future.

+6

Measure in 3D-model like CAD-software

RP-Precision il y a 3 ans dans Metrology Software / PC-DMIS mis à jour il y a 3 ans 2

Make a function that can measure dimensions in a 3-model like the same way as CAD-software can. Only to know how big some geometry is, or to check something. This can be usefull, because nowadays many drawings are minimum dimensions drawings.

+6

Min/Max reporting for multi-times hole pattern for size and true positions

Johnson JD il y a 4 ans dans Metrology Software / PC-DMIS mis à jour il y a 2 ans 3

Many times we have 25 to 100 x's size and location callouts for pattern of holes. It would be nice to have PC-DMIS be able to output Min/Max GeoTol values without hard coded variable arrays.

+6

Make Auto slots available as standard in all configurations (PRO, CAD, CAD++)

inspection il y a 5 ans dans Metrology Software / PC-DMIS mis à jour par Sevdi Guler il y a 5 ans 5
+6

PROBE CALIBRATION

Sergio il y a 7 ans dans Metrology Software / PC-DMIS mis à jour par neil kay il y a 6 ans 9


Add a key in the calibration area where you can save and import a list of angles because every time you create a probe you have to start from zero.

+6
Terminé

Easy way to populate results in excel based first article travelers

David Pinedo il y a 7 ans dans Metrology Software / PC-DMIS mis à jour par neil kay il y a 6 ans 7

Looking for a way to populate results in specific custom order in Excell based first article travelers.

+6

Remembering past measurements

Mitja Smrekar il y a 9 ans dans Metrology Software / PC-DMIS mis à jour par neil kay il y a 6 ans 4

Now PC-DMIS remembers only measurements made on the last part. A lot of time I need a complete data of part that was measured in past. It could be set to remember last xx measured parts. I know that Calypso has this feature.

+6
Terminé

DRF feature construction option(s) - relative to other features/datums

Jon Wood (NinjaBadger) il y a 9 ans dans Metrology Software / PC-DMIS mis à jour par neil kay il y a 6 ans 19 1 doublon

Add options to construct Datum features in such a way that they reflect the standard.


Example - Datum A is a Plane, and Datum B is a cylinder bore nominally perpendicular to the plane.


As per both ISO and ASME standards, Datum B would be a Max Insc Cylinder Perpendicular to Dat A.


It's easy enough to construct a Max Insc cylinder, but this wouldn't be forced perpendicular to the plane, currently you'd have to measure it as a series of circles, then construct a Max Insc Circle in the correct workplane after levelling to Dat A.


See bottom image for example (image shows shaft not bore but principle is the same).


Image 7


Like wise construct a datum plane from a measured plane relative to another feature (Top image)

+6

Make it possible to re-enumerate feature numbers after program is written/edited.

hellcatrydr il y a 9 ans dans Metrology Software / PC-DMIS mis à jour par Neil Challinor il y a 3 mois 1

Your program is finished but some points or features were added and their out of numerical order.

A Re-number feature would put them all in ascending order.

+5

Have the clearance cube wrap around the form of the part instead of a cube that has deadspace in it

Richmond il y a 2 ans dans Metrology Software / PC-DMIS mis à jour par Daniel Sylvester il y a 8 mois 1

This would save lots of time for some parts. Think of it like the shield from the Dune movies. The clearcube should form around the part

+5

Show constrained degrees of freedom in the geometric tolerance dialog window

Jacob Cheverie il y a 3 ans dans Metrology Software / PC-DMIS mis à jour il y a 3 ans 4

It would be helpful to see the actively constrained degrees of freedom as the feature control frame is being built in the geometric tolerance dialog window. As an example, assume I have a primary datum plane (normal Z+), a secondary datum cylinder (axis along Z), and a tertiary datum cylinder (axis along Z). Then, as I build my feature control frame, the geometric tolerance dialog window shows me which degrees of freedom become constrained as the images below show: 

Image 548

Image 549

Image 550

Image 551