Atualmente só é possível descrever as identificações dos elementos com no máximo 11 caracteres, seria interessante aumentar a quantidade de caracteres permitidos, assim poderia identificar melhor cada elemento da peça.

Add the strategies for laser extractions/direct measurements to the MSE to increase efficiency and add PMI capability.

In dialog boxes for scanning i.e. linear open, 'Boundary Points' and 'Initial Vectors' boxes are too small and cannot be resized to show all information and the need to scroll left and right and up and down in these boxes is inefficient. It would be good if the window was resigned or at least resizable for this purpose.

Include a modifier in Geometric tolerancing to dimension a surface profile per unit area.
I am seeing this more and more on customer parts and would like to have this functionality added to avoid long and complex coding.

It would be nice if there was a points remaining and/or next feature while DCC is executing.

PC-DMIS allows to construct a contact circle from 1 scan (it's called minimum scan in the circle dialog).

The problem is it works only with one input feature.

PC-DMIS should get the ability to also calculate contact circles from multiple scans and also from constructed filtered features (so the contact circle is more repeatable).

See the following links to the User Forum:

1. https://www.pcdmisforum.com/forum/pc-dmis-enterprise-metrology-software/pc-dmis-for-cmms/534132-need-help-with-the-function-scan-minimum-when-creating-a-circle
2. https://www.pcdmisforum.com/forum/pc-dmis-enterprise-metrology-software/pc-dmis-code-samples/534188-combine-points-from-two-filtered-scans-into-one-container-scan#post534188

Add the option to combine different GD&T into one callout, which would match the drawing. E.g. Size/Circularity/Perpendicularity in one callout.

When I create an edge point, there should be an option so I can extract the points with the appropriate move

Add a math selector of the tolerance zone when evaluating a profile with a datum (line or surface)

At the moment it automatically uses the "Default" math. It should be possible to use the "LSQ" math.

When evaluating a profile without datum this is already possible.

Reasons:

• Default math will still be available (to evaluate according to the standard)
• With "LSQ" math, one can better see the general form of the part, outliers are clearly identified
• "LSQ" math gives more repeatable results (better for MSA)

I understand that the "Default" math is the one we should use to measure according to the standard

but it can be difficult to understand the result it delivers. "LSQ" math gives easier to understand results witch is crucial to adjust the machine.

See this example:

Make Prehit and Retract together as one adjustable setting. Why do we need to have 2 separate settings?