Hexagon Measurement SystemsNo matter what Hexagon measurement equipment or software you use, we want to hear your ideas and suggestions on how we can improve.
Thanks for your assistance in helping us shape the future. |
|
Copy/Paste Parameters with option what to paste
When you Copy/Paste Parameters it will copy the whole set of parameters.
When you have let's say 100 holes which all have a different Sample Feature, and you want to change the Depth with Copy/Paste Parameters, ity will change everything, so also the Sample Feature.
So now I have to choose to manual change all Depth or manual change all Sample Feature.
Is it possible to have the option to select what parameters you want to paste?
With a popup menu or something like that?
Import new cad (step) use current program
I have a new REV and I want to Import the newest CAD (STEP FILE) and use the same program I've already written. Can anyone advise? Thank you.
create assemblies with mating parts instead of coordinates
By using CAD models, mate parts together the way Solidworks does. It has the ability to click mating center points to lock the XY and the click two mating faces to lock the Z. This would make it easier instead of inputting a XYZ coordinate move.
Adding the per unit flatness to a variable assignment.
This would help users with legacy dimensioning to capture the Per Unit answer and send to stats.
Making network licensing available
It would be nice to use the software on multiple pcs and "check out" license as needed. I do this with many other types of software and it works great. I'm shocked Hexagon does not utilize this. The license can be parked on my server and be accessed by multiple PC's only allowing the paid number of licenses to login. I'm being told this isn't available for PC DMIS from Hexagon.
Build a color map of a measured part in comparison with another measured part pattern but not with CAD
It would be great to be able to build a color map of a measured part based on its comparison with another patter-part and no with its CAD.
This option would be very usefull, for example, in the case where we have 2 parts: at first sight both of the parts have the same dimensions because the results of the measurements of both parts with caliper are similar and both parts are on tolerance with the CAD/drawing, but only one of them could be assembled. So, it would have sense that the difference between them must be on the shape, and the mentioned option would be the best chance to be able to see it.
Position to No Datums
ASME Y14.5-2009 7.6.2.3 Coaxial Features Without Datum References
This is an ability that I would like to see in PC-DMIS Xact-Measure.
If the call out is per the spec then PC-DMIS should abide by the standard.



concentricity and coaxiality - References "A-B"
Why can't I use the "A-B" cover for concentricity and coaxiality?
References are circles and cylinders.
Kundesupport af UserEcho
