Customer Request

Trend reports are very important for their operators. They mentioned wanting some kind of way to mark events so that they can understand why dips might have happened (or able to isolate out dates where you know why parts dipped out of tolerance and are not relevant)

Customer Request

They mentioned the idea of being able to scan parts (barcode/QR) in order to select parts or specific samples

Customer Request

Want the ability to merge two reports together. They can have 2 routines for one part, so merging would make it easier to share with customers. (They do this today by cut and pasting in Excel)

Customer request

Suggested use cases: they would use CAD report internally and then share text reports with customer (as a rule of thumb, they try not sharing too many details with customers)

I did a search and could not find anyone else posting the same and was surprised.  However, it may very well be that there is a hidden (no pun intended) setting that forces a different behaviour.

If i have an inserted Machine model into a program and an active Probe.  I can press the Hide button in the toolbar and they will no longer be visible.  But, as soon as I execute a feature or the program whether partial or complete, everything is displayed back again.  I find the same issue happens with dimension IDs.  If as a user I am choosing to disable the display of items, why is that choice been overridden.

If that is a design intent, I would like to have a setting added so as a user I can enforce a "Stay hidden if I told you so"

Please add Tracker Pilot for AT40x to the supported software list, so that we can get rid of leica update manager and so that legacy users can download the last version in the future, from the "universal" new platform.

Thank you!

Our Probe Utility Dialog has not really changed to the better as new releases are made.  I suggest efforts are placed into enhancing one dialog which is so critical to end users.  

One critical change in my view is for us to remove any checkboxes and displayed tags that do not apply to the currently opened Probe.  And present them as applicable.
One big/huge example are the checkboxes for Use Partial Calibration and Use Trax Calibration.
Use Partial Calibration is pretty much exclusive to SP25 scanning probes.  Why present/show, even if grayed out this box to a user that might be using  Camera, Laser, Touch trigger probe, etc?

TRAX calibration is exclusively for analog scanning probes and only applies to certain probes and controllers. This info is known to us.  We know which controllers (interface and Settings) have or need this calibration type.
We gray this checkbox out w/ a checked or unchecked condition because it is not applicable.  Why display it?

Our Probe Utility dialog offers tons of opportunities not only for improvement but for a better User Experience.

Its redesign is well past due.

The customer always has to manually export his XYZ file (File - Export - XYZ).
He would like to be able to write a command into the program so that it works automatically.

we have a part where we measured the TP (true position) of 10 (or more) circular features...does anyone know if it can be done or how to output the "average" TP on the reports and excel files (not vector, just straight average of the TP out of tolerance values)?  

Second idea is the possibility to Filter and Share a whole page of samples, i.e., we want to send to a client all the measurements for a range of samples of a part,  instead of having to select one by one and share...