Hi,

Maybe a bug or removed from program, but earlier it was worked.

It was a good trick, if we did'nt want to change the workplane to evaluation a point to point distance related to third element. Since 2019R2 is not worked.

Now If the third element Cylinder,Cone or 3D line(axis) it is not working:

If the third element plane working:

Could we kindly ask to repair this evaluation (ASAP because some of program use this method)

Thanks in advance!

The sample:

PNT1 =FEAT/CONTACT/VECTOR POINT/DEFAULT,CARTESIAN
THEO/<233.319,38.742,-22>,<0,0,1>
ACTL/<233.319,38.742,-22>,<0,0,1>
TARG/<233.319,38.742,-22>,<0,0,1>
SHOW FEATURE PARAMETERS=YES
SURFACE=THICKNESS_NONE,0
MEASURE MODE=NOMINALS
RMEAS=NONE,NONE,NONE
AUTO WRIST=NO
GRAPHICAL ANALYSIS=NO
FEATURE LOCATOR=NO,NO,""
SHOW CONTACT PARAMETERS=YES
AVOIDANCE MOVE=NO,DISTANCE=10
SHOW HITS=NO
PNT2 =FEAT/CONTACT/VECTOR POINT/DEFAULT,CARTESIAN
THEO/<217.035,39.671,0>,<0,0,1>
ACTL/<217.035,39.671,0>,<0,0,1>
TARG/<217.035,39.671,0>,<0,0,1>
SHOW FEATURE PARAMETERS=YES
SURFACE=THICKNESS_NONE,0
MEASURE MODE=NOMINALS
RMEAS=NONE,NONE,NONE
AUTO WRIST=NO
GRAPHICAL ANALYSIS=NO
FEATURE LOCATOR=NO,NO,""
SHOW CONTACT PARAMETERS=YES
AVOIDANCE MOVE=NO,DISTANCE=10
SHOW HITS=NO
CYL1 =FEAT/CONTACT/CYLINDER/DEFAULT,CARTESIAN,IN,LEAST_SQR
THEO/<124,50,-15>,<0,0,1>,44,20
ACTL/<124,50,-15>,<0,0,1>,44,20
TARG/<124,50,-15>,<0,0,1>
START ANG=0,END ANG=360
ANGLE VEC=<1,0,0>
DIRECTION=CCW
SHOW FEATURE PARAMETERS=YES
VOID DETECTION=NO
REMEASURE=NO,USE THEO=NO
SURFACE=THICKNESS_NONE,0
MEASURE MODE=NOMINALS
RMEAS=NONE,NONE,NONE
AUTO WRIST=NO
GRAPHICAL ANALYSIS=NO
FEATURE LOCATOR=NO,NO,""
SHOW CONTACT PARAMETERS=YES
NUMHITS=3,NUMLEVELS=3,DEPTH=0,END OFFSET=0,PITCH=0
SAMPLE METHOD=SAMPLE_HITS
SAMPLE HITS=0,SPACER=0
AVOIDANCE MOVE=BOTH,DISTANCE=10
FIND HOLE=DISABLED,ONERROR=NO,READ POS=NO
SHOW HITS=NO
COMMENT/REPT,
NOT OK- NOT working :-( Old version it was worked.
We use this lot of time because not neccesery to change the workplane
DIM DIST1= 2D DISTANCE FROM POINT PNT1 TO POINT PNT2 PERP TO CYLINDER CYL1,NO_RADIUS UNITS=MM,$
GRAPH=OFF TEXT=OFF MULT=10.00 OUTPUT=BOTH
AX NOMINAL +TOL -TOL MEAS DEV OUTTOL
M 0.929 0.010 -0.010 0.929 0.000 0.000 ----#----
PLN1 =FEAT/CONTACT/PLANE/DEFAULT,CARTESIAN,OUTLINE,LEAST_SQR
THEO/<214.878,46.819,0>,<0,0,1>
ACTL/<214.878,46.819,0>,<0,0,1>
TARG/<214.878,46.819,0>,<0,0,1>
ANGLE VEC=<1,0,0>,RADIAL
SHOW FEATURE PARAMETERS=YES
VOID DETECTION=NO
SURFACE=THICKNESS_NONE,0
MEASURE MODE=NOMINALS
RMEAS=NONE,NONE,NONE
AUTO WRIST=NO
GRAPHICAL ANALYSIS=NO
FEATURE LOCATOR=NO,NO,""
SHOW CONTACT PARAMETERS=YES
NUMHITS=3,NUMROWS=3
SPACER=0
AVOIDANCE MOVE=BOTH,DISTANCE=10
SHOW HITS=NO
COMMENT/REPT,
OK
DIM DIST2= 2D DISTANCE FROM POINT PNT1 TO POINT PNT2 PERP TO PLANE PLN1,NO_RADIUS UNITS=MM,$
GRAPH=OFF TEXT=OFF MULT=10.00 OUTPUT=BOTH
AX NOMINAL +TOL -TOL MEAS DEV OUTTOL
M 22.000 0.010 -0.010 22.000 0.000 0.000 ----#----

Up to version 2019, there is no actually vector direction of intersection point. T, I, J,K should be calculated so the point can be more useful when doing comparison. for now T, I, J, K are set at default value. 

user can use "relative to" option on scan feature to get reference location before touching off on real feature like point/plan/circle feature. "relative to" option is very useful on point/plan/circle feature. when I dealing with scan, it is very hard to touch correctly because variation on real part. I would love to use "relative to" on scan when it is available.

Have PC-DMIS prompt what probe is loaded any time there is an alarm after the probe change is initiated. Many time it looses track of what probe it has and crashes into the probe change rack. This happens often if a probe oscillation error occurs after the probe change sequence has started.

It could be grat to create a community for PC DMIS users where anyone can share his own problems, questions, examples, passion, experience...

This could help users in every day small problems and increase abilities of anyone that uses this software, in both big or small working reality. 

The community can't take the place of the assistance service, but it may be helpful too.

Wall Thikness Colormap.jpg

The attached JPG depicts a nominal wall thickness of 7 +/- 1.   This particular customer doesn't care about anything within 70% of the nominal.  This is why +0.8 and -0.8 of the tolerance is in green.     Part of their spec requires a seperate wall thickness evaluation.

I believe that this color map was done with Polyworks.  I have tried to duplicate this using the new Thickness colormap, but can not achieve this same type of result.

The closest I get to this type of scale is using the compare to CAD, but then my resulting color map looks more like a point color map then a surface colormap.  

It would be great if PC DMIS could duplicate this type of color map.

Currently, we can change the company logo just upper page.