Hexagon Measurement SystemsNo matter what Hexagon measurement equipment or software you use, we want to hear your ideas and suggestions on how we can improve.
Thanks for your assistance in helping us shape the future. |
![](/s/cache/7b/c1/7bc1a76cece4753db435d4ea4480ba8f.png)
Add ISO286 tolerance choice possibilities (h5, JS6 etc) to new size window, like old location dimension
Add ISO286 tolerance choice possibilities (h5, JS6 etc) to new size window, like old location.
Actual we have a minor bug in 2017 R2 SP5 If we choice outer diameter 8 h5 in location first the minus tolerance appear positive. If we push create after the good negative appear in edit window and reopen the dialog we show negative too. But firstly show positive :-(.
Is new size type
analysis we need to type the tolerance manually. In these place would
be great if we can to input ISO 286 tolerance too...
![](/s/cache/7a/c3/7ac32439a08a968b6d76e10bd328bb3b.png)
automatically change the measurement strategy based on probing type using MSE
[scenario] Create a measurement routine with adaptive scanning measurement strategies. Open that routine on a cmm without an analog scanning probe, that gives an error message.
What would be handy for shops with multiple cmm types, is to have a way to change (temporarily) the measurement strategy to a type the cmm supports based on its probing type, based on the defaults stored in the measurement strategy editor.
Most of the time, I use adaptive scanning to improve throughput on the cmm's. But there are still cmm's with only TTP modules on them. I use the same measurement routine on several cmm's, but the adaptive scanning makes this difficult since the ttp does not support it. Each cmm type has its own identifier so that the reporting gives the type of cmm used to verify the product. Thus there is traceability to the type of measurement strategies used to verify product.
![](https://cdn.userecho.com/characters/76.png?1)
Pc-DMIS 2017 R1 True Position
Hi guys so i updated pc DMis 2017 R1 SP 2 for SP 7 and after the update when i measure the true Position in Simple mode the true position allways stay on RED with *OUTTOUL* expression, even in repport the true position is in tolerance.
Anyone Knows why
Thans in advance
Luis Oliveira
![](https://cdn.userecho.com/characters/83.png?1)
for the Graphic view, it is better if there is one button to display the GRID
for the Graphic view, it is better if there is one button to display the GRID
![](https://cdn.userecho.com/characters/82.png?1)
Print report to excel both append and overwrite doesn't work
When I use the Print Report command twice, I can save the PDF both as append and overwrite of the measurements. But when I want to use one print command to append to Excel and one print command to overwrite to excel, then the last button I selected also becomes selected in the other print command (so that I get 2 appends to excel or 2 overwrites to excel). Seems like a bug.
![](/s/cache/7a/cf/7acf8dd403d2ce053e17a06d43afbf4b.png)
more constructions.
Example- be able to select which pierce point of circle to line or cylinder if more than one possible answer.
![](https://cdn.userecho.com/characters/82.png?1)
Pull data from auto feture sample hits
Have the ability to pull data from sample hit for constructed features.
![](/s/cache/7a/c3/7ac32439a08a968b6d76e10bd328bb3b.png)
Query measurement routine upon opening for features that are not used in contructions or dimensional outputs
this is to find features in the measurement routine that do not have any use (junk features), perhaps carried over from previous iterations or just not fully utilized (as constructions or alignments or output dimensionally). there is already a query for missing alignment recalls and dimensional outputs that have no feature ID's, so this would be an extension of that. Features created in the measurement routine should have a use as a construction of another feature, as an alignment, or as a dimensional output, or....
![](/s/cache/b2/00/b20044713a5e71e433c4e83409264edc.png)
create generic features from variable data
Currently there is the option, with variables, to pull all the elements from a feature at once using the .ALL extension.
What would be very useful is for a generic feature to be fully populated by the elements from the parent feature.
![](https://cdn.userecho.com/characters/100.png?1)
Reporting
Hello my name is Daniel Ślosarczyk on pc dmis has been working for 6 years. I miss reporting cad models and cut models in the report. In addition, the report could be more intuitive to make quick screans (see reporting polyworks)
Customer support service by UserEcho