Add a grouping key field, 2008 12 MMC Hole PC-DMIS – Q-DAS built in configurator. 

Key Field K2008 12 MMC (Hole).jpg

I would like a custom toolbar that can appear on every user's toolbar area by default just like the standard ones.  It would be incredibly handy to have a toolbar with custom function buttons that everyone has access to.  It would also streamline so many other things including setup and work instructions. Currently, to get that functionality, each user would have to configure their toolbar, which isn't practical for shops with multiple users and skill levels.  I would love to say in my work instructions: "press the <setup instructions> button in the toolbar" and know they have that button.

In the edit window, I would like to be able to copy a set of elements ordered as A-B-C-D and paste them as D-C-B-A.

Would like to see and use the threaded holes of the tables, for fixture position and at the same time then we can see where machine can reach.

We would like to be able to filter different areas with different densities. 

While creating a new test program using the QIF model, I had to edit the program and enter different tip angles to measure features on different planes / axis directions. But while the Optimize path workflow is active and the "Ask For Tip" window is open to select the tip angle for the applicable feature, the model CAN NOT be rotated or moved to get a view where this feature is and make a choice on the tip angle, I also can't move the feature labels or hide them for clarity in the Graphics window.

Many years ago i remember changing a setting in the settings editor that would add a space between the dimensions on the report.  I cannot remember where this was.  Currently, we insert a blank report comment to get the space in between.  Does anyone know if this option still exists?

As Header states, a simple built in label at the end of the program and at a pre header beginning would be very helpful to allow header label modification, easily start over program based on conditional statements, or end program.

I think an actual option for saving exclusion planes to be used in other routines would be extremely beneficial and would simplify things.

One filter that I really wish was available for a laser-scan COP is a one that just removes all laser points within x distance of a seam in a solid model.  Trying to get a surface profile measurement of a scanned part is inevitably thrown off because the physical part has had the edges smoothed per drawing requirements, but the model had sharp edges so it shows up as an out-of-tolerance condition.

I'd love to have a filter were I can specify a distance, and then either select individual seam lines or just pick "all seams" to filter out these edge points from the COP.

A .015"/.005" break edge requirement means on a .010-profile surface all of the edges will be out of spec, and the measurement will not be an accurate representation of the part.