Hexagon Measurement      Systems

No matter what Hexagon measurement equipment or software you use, we want to hear your ideas and suggestions on how we can improve.

  • Your feedback and voting will benefit the majority of users.
  • You have 10 votes which you can allocate to your own or other users ideas.
  • We will focus on trying to realize the top voted items in our future products.

Thanks for your assistance in helping us shape the future.

+5

Basic Dimension option

gsciola منذ 9 سنة في Metrology Software / PC-DMIS تم التحديث من قبل neil kay منذ 6 سنة 0

How about a Basic Dimension option, in the Location Tool Box. That way the basic dimensions don't need to have tolerances.

+5

Angular Length Reporting

SalihaGungor منذ 9 سنة في Metrology Software / PC-DMIS تم التحديث من قبل neil kay منذ 6 سنة 1

Image 12Maybe there is an easy way to report it ;if we have either a check box on the location (angle between) dialog window like "from formula" or an easier assignment set will be great.

Here is the code in order to report it :


Image 14

CIR1 =FEAT/CIRCLE,CARTESIAN,OUT,LEAST_SQR
THEO/<98.516,-145.613,-2.547>,<0,0,1>,506.5,0
ACTL/<98.516,-145.613,-2.547>,<0,0,1>,506.5,0
MEAS/CIRCLE,4,ZPLUS
HIT/BASIC,NORMAL,<51.696,103.272,-2.55>,<-0.1848771,0.9827616,0>,<51.696,103.272,-2.55>,USE THEO=YES HIT/BASIC,NORMAL,<99.287,107.636,-1.309>,<0.0030416,0.9999954,0>,<99.287,107.636,-1.309>,USE THEO=YES
HIT/BASIC,NORMAL,<166.819,98.253,-3.669>,<0.2697032,0.9629435,0>,<166.819,98.253,-3.669>,USE THEO=YES
HIT/BASIC,NORMAL,<227.698,72.212,-2.661>,<0.5100969,0.8601169,0>,<227.698,72.212,-2.661>,USE THEO=YES
ENDMEAS/
LIN1 =FEAT/LINE,CARTESIAN,UNBOUNDED
THEO/<31.03,97.103,-1.56>,<-0.7071068,-0.7071068,0>
ACTL/<31.03,97.103,-1.56>,<-0.7071068,-0.7071068,0>
MEAS/LINE,2,ZPLUS
HIT/BASIC,NORMAL,<31.03,97.103,1.086>,<-0.7071068,0.7071068,0>,<31.03,97.103,1.086>,USE THEO=YES
HIT/BASIC,NORMAL,<-13.352,52.72,-4.207>,<-0.7071068,0.7071068,0>,<-13.352,52.72,-4.207>,USE THEO=YES
ENDMEAS/
LIN2 =FEAT/LINE,CARTESIAN,UNBOUNDED
THEO/<239,62.251,-5.264>,<0,-1,0>
ACTL/<239,62.251,-5.264>,<0,-1,0>
MEAS/LINE,2,ZPLUS
HIT/BASIC,NORMAL,<239,62.251,-5.016>,<1,0,0>,<239,62.251,-5.016>,USE THEO=YES
HIT/BASIC,NORMAL,<239,53.115,-5.512>,<1,0,0>,<239,53.115,-5.512>,USE THEO=YES
ENDMEAS/
PNT1 =FEAT/POINT,CARTESIAN,NO
THEO/<239,65.1,-5.264>,<0,-1,0>
ACTL/<239,65.1,-5.264>,<0,-1,0>
CONSTR/POINT,PIERCE,CIR1,LIN2
PNT2 =FEAT/POINT,CARTESIAN,NO
THEO/<32.922,98.995,-1.56>,<-0.7071068,-0.7071068,0>
ACTL/<32.922,98.995,-1.56>,<-0.7071068,-0.7071068,0>
CONSTR/POINT,PIERCE,CIR1,LIN1
LIN3 =FEAT/LINE,CARTESIAN,UNBOUNDED,NO
THEO/<98.516,-145.613,-2.547>,<-0.259008,0.9658673,0.0038973>
ACTL/<98.516,-145.613,-2.547>,<-0.259008,0.9658673,0.0038973>
CONSTR/LINE,BF,3D,CIR1,PNT2,,
OUTLIER_REMOVAL/OFF,3
FILTER/OFF,WAVELENGTH=0
LIN4 =FEAT/LINE,CARTESIAN,UNBOUNDED,NO
THEO/<98.516,-145.613,-2.547>,<0.5546916,0.8319869,-0.0107257>
ACTL/<98.516,-145.613,-2.547>,<0.5546916,0.8319869,-0.0107257>
CONSTR/LINE,BF,3D,CIR1,PNT1,,
OUTLIER_REMOVAL/OFF,3
FILTER/OFF,WAVELENGTH=0
DIM ANGL1= 2D ANGLE FROM LINE LIN4 TO LINE LIN3 ,$
GRAPH=OFF TEXT=OFF MULT=10.00 OUTPUT=BOTH
AX MEAS NOMINAL +TOL -TOL DEV OUTTOL
A 48.703 48.703 0.010 0.010 0.000 0.000 ----#----
ASSIGN/V1=((2*3.14*CIR1.R.MEAS)/360)*ANGL1.A.MEAS
F1 =GENERIC/NONE,DEPENDENT,CARTESIAN,OUT,$
NOM/XYZ,<0,0,0>,$ MEAS/XYZ,<0,0,0>,$
NOM/IJK,<0,0,1>,$
MEAS/IJK,<0,0,1>,$
RADIUS/0,0,$
ANGLE/215.5,V1,$
DISTANCE/0,0
DIM LOC1= LOCATION OF PLANE F1 UNITS=MM ,$
GRAPH=OFF TEXT=OFF MULT=10.00 OUTPUT=BOTH HALF ANGLE=NO
AX MEAS NOMINAL +TOL -TOL DEV OUTTOL
A 215.160 215.500 0.500 0.500 -0.340 0.000 -#-------
END OF DIMENSION LOC1

+5
تم الإنجاز

Allow Max & Min Index of Polar Radius from a scanned feature

Ben Fisher منذ 9 سنة في Metrology Software / PC-DMIS تم التحديث من قبل neil kay منذ 3 سنة 3

When finding a high point of a linear feature it's possible to use the Maxindex assignment relative to a specific axis. For example "maxindex(scan.x)". This will return the max value in X for that scan.


When scanning radial features and finding a max Polar Radius, one would expect to use "maxindex(scan.PR)" to return the max value for PR in that scan. Thus giving a high point of a radius for example.


This command doesn't work with polar radius.

+4

Save the PC-DMIS version/SP/Schema so that we can identify what version of PC-DMIS is needed to open this file.

Matt Beecher منذ 11 شهر في Metrology Software / PC-DMIS تم التحديث من قبل Neil Challinor منذ 5 شهر 2

Can we get some way to record what version/schema of PC-DMIS is required to open a particular PC-DMIS file?  With the rolling cutoff and some users having a mix of schema for their routines, I fear difficulties with using the migration utilities in the future. 

+4

Add UPR as smart parameter in the measurement strategy editor

Stan Deenen منذ 1 سنة في Metrology Software / PC-DMIS 0

As more and more customers are asking us to scan (with a probe) all features, they also got their standards for using the filters in scanning. In those standards, they also ask for a specific UPR which relates to the current diameter. For example, Ø8 and smaller require a UPR setting of 15. Ø8-Ø25 require UPR 50 etc.

I'd like to add this as a smart parameter in the Measurement Strategy Editor to make sure we also use the correct settings.

+4

AUTO PLANE RINGS

barnett_james منذ 2 سنة في Metrology Software / PC-DMIS تم التحديث من قبل Neil Challinor منذ 5 شهر 3

I would like to see an option where we can adjust the distance between multiple rings when checking a radial auto plane. We of course have the option to adjust the size of the rings but, to my knowledge, don't have the option to adjust the distance between.

+4

Comment Box Update!

DavidthatDay منذ 2 سنة في Metrology Software / PC-DMIS 0

I think the Comment box could use some help.  I've been using PCDMIS since the 2014 version and its basically untouched in 10 years.  As an offline programmer, the comments are sometimes the only way I can communicate to the inspection operators.  

I have seen some people on here asking for Font Types and Colors, and i think that's a really great idea!

I would also like to see more ALT codes translated correctly to the comment box,   or maybe add more than the four symbols at the bottom of the Comment Text Box.  GD&T uses so many different symbols to communicate there should be a library to choose from when typing out or operator comments. 

Even as I type this out, I'm looking at the options i have to edit my text and I would love to see something similar to this woven into the comment section of PCDMIS. (see below)

Image 599


+4

Possibility to disable automatic highlighting of the feature on which the cursor is located

R. Kempe منذ 2 سنة في Metrology Software / PC-DMIS تم التحديث من قبل Robin Wick منذ 2 سنة 2

There should be an option to disable automatic highlighting of a feature on which the cursor is placed.

When programming, the large shadow of the highlight can interfere. Especially with single circles this is a disadvantage.

At the moment there is only the possibility to change the color of the highlight.

+4

We should be able to see 2 programs in the scream to be able to compare both

Diego Almeida منذ 3 سنة في Metrology Software / PC-DMIS تم التحديث من قبل Kingsld1 منذ 3 سنة 1

Sometimes we need to compare the programs in what is different.

+4

Graphic Analysis View

Sara K منذ 4 سنة في Metrology Software / PC-DMIS تم التحديث من قبل ANDHERO منذ 3 سنة 1

Add the ability to turn off previous graphic analysis views / show one graphic analysis view at a time. Adding graphic analysis views makes the snapshot for the report cluttered and hard to read. We should be able to disable / enable graphic analysis views on dimensions in the snapshot and/or recall a viewset to "reset" the graphic view.

خدمة دعم العملاء من خلال UserEcho