I have a program with a CAD model in it, but I do not have a model in any other CAD format (stp, igs, prt...) only .cad from PC-DMIS. I need a function to export CAD model from PC-DMIS to other formats like stp and igs.

Situation is: I have only a PC-DMIS program and I need a model because we can not find that model anywhere.

When I import my 1-2-3 blocks for fixturing or whatever I bring in, I would like each of them to be able to have their own clearance cube instead of having to have a large cube encompassing the whole set up.  Sometimes with larger fixtures it would definitely speed things up if the probe didn't think it had to move so far away from my part just because the constraints of the CC are limited to the overall size of my imported fixturing.  And why stop there, also make it where if I don't have a fixture model I can manually set up a cube just for that single fixture piece as well.

Add more information to the calibration results window like: touch speed, scan speed, move speed, prehit/retract distance and so on. It would help to decide if the calibration has to be done again because of differences in these settings.

Here's an example:

Add something like a clearance cube around a probe changer if desired.

Basically like a saftey zone around the rack so that someone cant run probe, probe head, z rail into it while running a program.

Add a field in the lower level matrix calibration dialog box which informs the technician when the last time the lower matrix cal was performed.

When scrolling through a large program it can be difficult to find where you are in the program, even when clicking through bookmarks.

Colour coded markers on the scrollbar might help find bookmarks/breakpoints etc.

Some drawings show a gradual transition between profile tolerances but I'm currently unable to show this in a CMM report.

Add the ability to work with Wind Chill cad management.   At least around here, Team Center is dying. 

Found the constraint on radius/diameter of Circle, but need the constraint activated on the center of circle, to calculate actual radius/diameter on very small portion of circle.

When reporting features to Datums with MMC, the position of the features measured tend to always be zero, while the Datums the features are referenced to have a measurement? why is this? can the datums not be removed so only the features being measured show a measured value.